|mind, matter, meaning and information|
What does it mean to say that something is real? Webster, again (see the word), has, among other senses, “not artificial, fraudulent, illusory, or apparent: genuine” and “occurring in fact.” As an example of what is clearly not real, we might take a desert mirage. But say what was taken to be a mirage turns out, on closer examination, not to be one after all. It could be some other kind of illusion, or perhaps even an actual body of water where none was believed to exist. So is this an unreal mirage? It seems to me that it is, and that the concept of reality is context-dependent. [That argument probably requires expansion, but the basics are there.]
The notion that reality is not context-dependent is sometimes called "naïve realism". It tends to be associated with certain other assumptions, for instance that different explanations for a given phenomenon are necessarily mutually exclusive. (This is highly deserving of discussion, and I will write something on it quite soon, I hope.)
Having said which, the context is often quite obvious, and it seems fairly clear that what “reality” generally means is, what's “out there,” or objective, as opposed to what merely seems to be out there, and is subjective. Unfortunately, where subjective experience is the focus of interest, that approach just does not work—see objectivity and the human point of view.
Copyright © 1998--2005 by Robin Faichney.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available
Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is prohibited without
the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
Distribution of the work or derivative of the work in any standard (paper) book form is
prohibited unless prior permission is obtained from the copyright holder.
Last modified 23-Feb-2005 14:36:17 by Robin Faichney .